Individual Detail
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
8 |
0 |
20 |
4.00 |
80 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
10 |
1 |
20 |
4.75 |
95 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
8 |
0 |
20 |
4.00 |
80 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
7 |
0 |
20 |
3.50 |
70 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
6 |
0 |
20 |
3.00 |
60 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
40 |
| Total |
9.0 |
50 |
1 |
180 |
2.75 |
495 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
9.0 |
3 |
0 |
180 |
0.17 |
30 |
Jake, Missouri
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
15 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
-5 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Total |
9.0 |
10 |
2 |
180 |
0.50 |
90 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
-5 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
-5 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
9.0 |
2 |
2 |
180 |
0.06 |
10 |
Jack, Chicago E
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
15 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
-5 |
| Total |
9.0 |
11 |
2 |
180 |
0.56 |
100 |
Bruce, Chicago E
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
5 |
2 |
20 |
2.00 |
40 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
6 |
1 |
20 |
2.75 |
55 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
15 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
6 |
0 |
20 |
3.00 |
60 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
6 |
0 |
20 |
3.00 |
60 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
3 |
2 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
7 |
1 |
20 |
3.25 |
65 |
| Total |
9.0 |
37 |
7 |
180 |
1.86 |
335 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
25 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
9.0 |
5 |
1 |
180 |
0.25 |
45 |
Seth, Chicago C
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
40 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
2 |
2 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
15 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
35 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
15 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
2 |
2 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
6 |
1 |
20 |
2.75 |
55 |
| Total |
9.0 |
27 |
8 |
180 |
1.28 |
230 |
Ray, Chicago C
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
5 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
15 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
50 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
25 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
15 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Total |
9.0 |
19 |
4 |
180 |
0.94 |
170 |
Laura, Chicago C
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
7 |
2 |
20 |
3.00 |
60 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
9 |
0 |
20 |
4.50 |
90 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
7 |
1 |
20 |
3.25 |
65 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
6 |
1 |
20 |
2.75 |
55 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
5 |
1 |
20 |
2.25 |
45 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
4 |
2 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
6 |
0 |
20 |
3.00 |
60 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
7 |
1 |
20 |
3.25 |
65 |
| Total |
9.0 |
52 |
8 |
180 |
2.67 |
480 |
Jerod, Chicago C
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
0 |
2 |
20 |
-0.50 |
-10 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
0 |
2 |
20 |
-0.50 |
-10 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
0 |
2 |
20 |
-0.50 |
-10 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
5 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
3 |
3 |
20 |
0.75 |
15 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
5 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
15 |
| Total |
9.0 |
11 |
12 |
180 |
0.28 |
50 |
Matt, Rose-Hulman A
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
0 |
2 |
20 |
-0.50 |
-10 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
9.0 |
5 |
2 |
180 |
0.22 |
40 |
Stephen, Rose-Hulman A
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
25 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
9.0 |
12 |
1 |
180 |
0.64 |
115 |
Chris, Rose-Hulman A
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
-5 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
4 |
2 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
8 |
2 |
20 |
3.50 |
70 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
0 |
2 |
20 |
-0.50 |
-10 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
25 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
35 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
5 |
2 |
20 |
2.00 |
40 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
2 |
2 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Total |
9.0 |
29 |
13 |
180 |
1.25 |
225 |
Amber, Rose-Hulman A
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
5 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Total |
9.0 |
6 |
1 |
180 |
0.31 |
55 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
10 |
3 |
20 |
4.25 |
85 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
12 |
0 |
20 |
6.00 |
120 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
5 |
2 |
20 |
2.00 |
40 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
5 |
3 |
20 |
1.75 |
35 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
7 |
2 |
20 |
3.00 |
60 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
8 |
1 |
20 |
3.75 |
75 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
7 |
0 |
20 |
3.50 |
70 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
3 |
2 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Total |
9.0 |
59 |
13 |
180 |
2.92 |
525 |
Tim, Chicago D
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
5 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
9.0 |
10 |
1 |
180 |
0.53 |
95 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Total |
9.0 |
8 |
0 |
180 |
0.44 |
80 |
Ryan, Michigan
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
50 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
6 |
2 |
20 |
2.50 |
50 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
15 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
3 |
3 |
20 |
0.75 |
15 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
1 |
2 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
5 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
2 |
3 |
20 |
0.25 |
5 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
3 |
2 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Total |
9.0 |
25 |
14 |
180 |
1.00 |
180 |
Matt, Michigan
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
40 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
40 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
35 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
6 |
0 |
20 |
3.00 |
60 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
15 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
25 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Total |
9.0 |
29 |
3 |
180 |
1.53 |
275 |
Zeke, Michigan
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
6 |
2 |
20 |
2.50 |
50 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
5 |
2 |
20 |
2.00 |
40 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
7 |
2 |
20 |
3.00 |
60 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
50 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
4 |
3 |
20 |
1.25 |
25 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
6 |
1 |
20 |
2.75 |
55 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
5 |
2 |
20 |
2.00 |
40 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
7 |
1 |
20 |
3.25 |
65 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
2 |
3 |
20 |
0.25 |
5 |
| Total |
9.0 |
47 |
16 |
180 |
2.17 |
390 |
Leo, Michigan
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
5 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
-5 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
5 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
-5 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
25 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Total |
9.0 |
11 |
5 |
180 |
0.47 |
85 |
David, Chicago A
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
-5 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Total |
9.0 |
6 |
1 |
180 |
0.31 |
55 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
50 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
25 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
0 |
2 |
20 |
-0.50 |
-10 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
40 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
5 |
| Total |
9.0 |
21 |
4 |
180 |
1.06 |
190 |
Seth, Chicago A
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
10 |
1 |
20 |
4.75 |
95 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
50 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
9 |
0 |
20 |
4.50 |
90 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
6 |
2 |
20 |
2.50 |
50 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
3 |
2 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
10 |
2 |
20 |
4.50 |
90 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
9 |
0 |
20 |
4.50 |
90 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
7 |
2 |
20 |
3.00 |
60 |
| Total |
9.0 |
62 |
9 |
180 |
3.19 |
575 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
5 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
4 |
2 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
6 |
0 |
20 |
3.00 |
60 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
7 |
1 |
20 |
3.25 |
65 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
25 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
5 |
1 |
20 |
2.25 |
45 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
5 |
1 |
20 |
2.25 |
45 |
| Total |
9.0 |
35 |
7 |
180 |
1.75 |
315 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
5 |
1 |
20 |
2.25 |
45 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
7 |
3 |
20 |
2.75 |
55 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
40 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
7 |
1 |
20 |
3.25 |
65 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
35 |
| Total |
9.0 |
32 |
6 |
180 |
1.61 |
290 |
Chad, Chicago F
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
5 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
-5 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Total |
9.0 |
9 |
2 |
180 |
0.44 |
80 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Total |
9.0 |
9 |
0 |
180 |
0.50 |
90 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
9 |
3 |
20 |
3.75 |
75 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
14 |
2 |
20 |
6.50 |
130 |
| Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U. |
1.0 |
14 |
0 |
20 |
7.00 |
140 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
16 |
2 |
20 |
7.50 |
150 |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
14 |
1 |
20 |
6.75 |
135 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
15 |
1 |
20 |
7.25 |
145 |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
14 |
2 |
20 |
6.50 |
130 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
11 |
5 |
20 |
4.25 |
85 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
14 |
3 |
20 |
6.25 |
125 |
| Total |
9.0 |
121 |
19 |
180 |
6.19 |
1115 |
Fine, Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U.
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Michigan |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Missouri |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
7.0 |
2 |
0 |
140 |
0.14 |
20 |
Craig, Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U.
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
5 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
-5 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Michigan |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Missouri |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
7.0 |
3 |
2 |
140 |
0.14 |
20 |
Frederickson, Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U.
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
30 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
40 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
5 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Michigan |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Missouri |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
7.0 |
12 |
1 |
140 |
0.82 |
115 |
Chris, Rose-Hulman B/Ad Hoc U.
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Chicago E |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago D |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Rose-Hulman A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
10 |
| Chicago B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago F |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Chicago C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Michigan |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Missouri |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
7.0 |
1 |
0 |
140 |
0.07 |
10 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
Pts |
| Michigan |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
35 |
| Missouri |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
20 |
| Total |
2.0 |
6 |
1 |
40 |
1.38 |
55 |